Content provided by StrategyTraining.com & Firmsconsulting.com. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by StrategyTraining.com & Firmsconsulting.com or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

People love us!

User reviews

"Love the offline function"
"This is "the" way to handle your podcast subscriptions. It's also a great way to discover new podcasts."

598: Mathematical precision hurts (Case Interview & Management Consulting classics)

5:35
 
Share
 

Manage episode 372697859 series 99558
Content provided by StrategyTraining.com & Firmsconsulting.com. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by StrategyTraining.com & Firmsconsulting.com or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://cloudutil.player.fm/legal.

For this episode, let's revisit a Case Interview & Management Consulting classic where we speak about mathematical precision.

As counter-intuitive as this sounds, mathematical precision in cases hurts most candidates. Many candidates focus heavily on being mathematically correct because it is far easier to see if your answer of $230MM is the same as the prescribed answer of $250MM. It is human nature to focus on what can be easily measured versus focusing on what should be measured. Candidates tend to confuse mathematical precision with being analytic. They are not the same and candidates should focus on being analytic, as explained in this podcast.

Here are some free gifts for you:

Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach

McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf

Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

  continue reading

620 episodes

iconShare
 
Manage episode 372697859 series 99558
Content provided by StrategyTraining.com & Firmsconsulting.com. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by StrategyTraining.com & Firmsconsulting.com or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://cloudutil.player.fm/legal.

For this episode, let's revisit a Case Interview & Management Consulting classic where we speak about mathematical precision.

As counter-intuitive as this sounds, mathematical precision in cases hurts most candidates. Many candidates focus heavily on being mathematically correct because it is far easier to see if your answer of $230MM is the same as the prescribed answer of $250MM. It is human nature to focus on what can be easily measured versus focusing on what should be measured. Candidates tend to confuse mathematical precision with being analytic. They are not the same and candidates should focus on being analytic, as explained in this podcast.

Here are some free gifts for you:

Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach

McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf

Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

  continue reading

620 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Quick Reference Guide